Proposed Gulf Coast Claims Facility Protocol- State Attorneys General Find Several Problems
In an effort to protect individual and business claimants, Attorneys General from Maryland, Delaware and North Carolina recently delivered a letter to Kenneth Feinberg asking him to address some flaws they have detected in the proposed protocol for paying BP Oil Spill claims.
These Attorneys General believe the protocol should reflect that state law on proximate cause applies only to state tort claims for damages that are not covered by the Oil Pollution Act, and that state law on proximate cause does not apply to OPA claims. The AGs believe that in the case of an OPA claim, the claimant is simply required to demonstrate that the damages incurred resulted from the BP oil release. See 33 U.S.C. § 2702(a)
The AG's also had problems with the following areas of the proposed protocol:
- Lack of a procedure for the payment or settlement of claims for interim, short-term damages beyond 90 days, as required by 33 U.S.C. § 2705.
- A requirement for claimants who seek lost profits claims to demonstrate that their loss was caused by damage or loss to property or resources "that are used by the Claimant," which is inconsistent with the requirement in 33 U.S.C. § 2702(b)(2)(E) that an injured party need only show that the loss of profits come "as a result of the incident."
- A requirement that the claimant sign a general release of all rights the claimant may have against BP, which is inconsistent with OPA.
- A limitation that no claim may be submitted to the GCCF "more than three years after the date the Protocol becomes operative," which is inconsistent with the periods of limitation provided in 33 U.S.C.§ 2717.
- Insufficient time (7 days) for a claimant to appeal a decision to the Appeals Board.
- A limitation that payment on claims will be reduced by payments received from collateral sources is a cause of concern and may be inconsistent with the liability of a responsible party under OPA or state laws. In no event should a collateral source limitation interfere with the expeditious and complete recovery by any individual or business claimant.
Source:
